Hank’s primary area of practice is insurance litigation, representing major insurance companies and third party administrators in all aspects of insurance litigation, including motor vehicle accidents, premises liability (slip and fall cases and swimming pool accidents), catastrophic injury claims (brain and spinal cord injuries), products liability cases, arson and fraud claims, coverage analysis, and extra-contractual liability and “bad faith” claims. He has represented insurers and insureds in over 90 of Kentucky’s 120 counties and tried cases in over 60 of Kentucky’s counties. Additionally, Hank is a certified mediator and has mediated cases in the above areas of practice since 1999.
- Best Lawyers in America® Insurance Law Lexington Lawyer of the Year (2014)
- Best Lawyers in America®: Insurance Law
- Kentucky Super Lawyers®: Civil Litigation Defense, Insurance Coverage, Personal Injury Defense: General
- AV Preeminent® Peer Review Rated by Martindale-Hubbell®
- Litigation Counsel of America, Fellow
- National Academy of Distinguished Neutrals
- Association of Attorney-Mediators
- Mediation Center of Kentucky, Certified mediator
PROFESSIONAL & CIVIC ACTIVITIES
- Kentucky Defense Counsel, Board of Directors (1984-1989, 1992-1999), President (1988-1989, 1997-1998)
- Defense Research Institute, Kentucky Representative (2000-2002), Exceptional Performance Citation (1989 & 1998)
- Insurance Law Committee
- Trial Tactics Committee
- American Board of Trial Advocates
- Central Kentucky American Inn of Court
- Fayette County Bar Association, Sergeant-At-Arms, Board of Governors (1975-1976)
- Bowling Green-Warren County Bar Association
- Kentucky Bar Association, Ethics Committee
- American Bar Association, Torts & Insurance Practice Section
- Ethics in Mediation, presentation for the Association of Attorney-Mediators Advanced Attorney-Mediator Training (2017)
- Mediation: Nuts & Bolts, Kentucky Bar Association New Lawyer Program (2017)
- Consent Judgments & Forbearance Agreements, Kentucky Justice Association’s Bad Faith in Kentucky CLE (2016)
- Professional Responsibility: Dealing with Ethical Challenges in Your Practice, KBA Kentucky Law Update CLE (2015)
- Voir Dire and the Art of Asking the Right Questions, Voire Dire & Jury Selection NBI CLE (2015)
- Jury Selection Strategy, Voire Dire & Jury Selection NBI CLE (May 2015)
- Social Media Use and Other Complex Jury Issues, Voire Dire & Jury Selection NBI CLE (May 2015)
- Ethical Considerations in Jury Selection, Voire Dire & Jury Selection NBI CLE (2015)
- The Upcoming Role of Mediation in Kentucky, KBA Kentucky Law Update CLE (2014)
- Practical Tips for Jury Selection in Civil Litigation, KBA Kentucky Law Update CLE (2014)
- Effective (and Ineffective) Mediation Strategy and Presentation from a Mediator’s Perspective, KBA Kentucky Law Update CLE (2013)
- Litigating the Declaratory Judgment Action, DRI’s In House Quarterly (Fall 2015)
- University of Kentucky, J. D. (1973)
- University of Kentucky, B.S. (1970)
- Danny Knox vs. Housewarmings; Trane, U.S., Inc., et al., Powell Circuit Court, Civil Action No. 12-CI-00092. Counsel for propane gas supplier in explosion resulting in 3 deaths.
- American Automobile Insurance Co. vs. Paul Bariteau, et al., U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky at Louisville, Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-194-H.
- The Nature Conservancy v. Sims, USDC, EDKY, 07-CV-00112.
- Sherrod v. CRM, FCC, 11-CI-00046.
- Layton Register vs. The Nature Conservancy, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington, Civil Action No. 13-cv-0007; This was a suit by a major donor seeking recovery of restricted gift from an international conservation organization.
- Estepp v. Peters, No. 2012-CA-943 (Ky. App.) (opinion citation: 2014 WL 2640607, Ky. App. June 13, 2014): Obtained summary judgment at trial court level based on the statute of limitations and application of Gailor v. Alsabi, 990 S.W.2d 597 (Ky. 1999) for estate of driver killed in automobile accident. Obtained dismissal at appellate level for the opposing party’s failure to timely appeal a final and appealable order.
- Neal v. Donelson, et al., 2013-CA-1370 (2013): Plaintiff alleged severe eye injury due to a firework on property owned by our client. Successfully obtained summary judgment as to our client’s liability before the Kenton Circuit Court. Plaintiff’s subsequent appeal was ultimately dismissed for failure to prosecute.
- Chappell v. Transit Authority of the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government (LexTran), et al., Fayette Circuit Court, Division 4, Civil Action No.: 10-CI-3051: Personal injury case, including allegations of a severe brain injury, involving collision between pedestrian and bus.
- Curry v. Taylor, et al., Jefferson Circuit Court, No. 12-CI-02899 (2013): Plaintiff alleged a dog bite to a minor. Successfully obtained a dismissal for lack of prosecution.
- Moses v. Baker, 798 F. Supp.2d 863 (E.D. Ky. 2011): We represented an insurer on an underinsured motorist coverage issue in an Ohio policy in this published federal court opinion and won summary judgment on two independent bases. The court agreed with our arguments that an “other owned vehicle” exclusion precluded coverage and that the plaintiff failed to show that the decedent was a “resident relative” entitled to coverage under the policy.
- Hicks v. Linville, No. 09-385-JBC (E.D. Ky. Sept. 20, 2011): This is federal case in which we represented an insurer on an underinsured motorist coverage issue in an Ohio policy, and obtained the plaintiff’s agreement that Ohio law applied to the policy and required a set-off, which greatly reduced the exposure. Additionally, we obtained a ruling from the federal court that the plaintiff was not entitled to medical payments benefits because those damages were not sought in the complaint.
- Coach v. First Time, Inc., Hardin Circuit Court, 08-CI-29 (2012): Plaintiff alleged claims against a property management company following a trip and fall. Following a successful settlement of the plaintiff’s claim, we represented the insurer who paid the settlement against another insurer, claiming that the policies applied on a pro rata basis. The other insurer argued that our client’s insurance was primary. The trial court granted summary judgment in our favor, finding that the policies applied pro rata.
- James v. Great American Insurance Group, Inc., Johnson Circuit Court, Case No. 07-CI-0351 (2010): Successfully obtained summary judgment in favor of insurance company client finding no coverage for the plaintiff’s alleged claims against the putative insured due to an earth movement exclusion.
If you are seeking representation, you must call our office as we do not take requests for representation via email or through our website.
Please read the following notice before sending an email to our firm:
Sending us an email will not make you a client of our firm. Until we have agreed to represent you, anything you send us will not be confidential or privileged. A conflicts-of-interest review must be completed by us before we can establish an attorney-client relationship with you.
By clicking “I Accept These Terms” below, you confirm that you have read and understood this notice.